crab: has physical part claw

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shellfish
Weight: 0.67
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, arthropod
Weight: 0.62
, predator
Weight: 0.62
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.39
, shrimp
Weight: 0.38
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37
, scallop
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part claw 1.00
have one claw 0.94
have big claw 0.93
have one big claw 0.92
lose claw 0.91
lose big claw 0.90
has physical part claws 0.83
have two big claws 0.77
lose claws 0.77
cut off claws 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lobster, has physical part claw)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lobster, has physical part claws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lobster, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lobster, has physical part claw)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(lobster, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lobster, has physical part claws)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(crab, has physical part claw)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(crab, lose claw)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(crab, lose claw)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(crab, has physical part claws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(crab, has physical part claws)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crab, has physical part claws)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(crab, has physical part claw)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(crab, has physical part claw)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lobster, has physical part claw)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(crab, has physical part claw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lobster, has physical part claws)