crack: is less expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drug
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dike
Weight: 0.45
, cracking
Weight: 0.35
, cocain
Weight: 0.33
, tear
Weight: 0.32
, methamphetamine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less expensive 1.00
is cheaper 0.86
be cheaper than powder 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(crack, is less expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(crack, be cheaper than powder)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(crack, be cheaper than powder)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crack, be cheaper than powder)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(crack, be cheaper than powder)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(crack, is less expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(crack, is less expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crack, is less expensive)