cracker: be banned in delhi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.56
, junk food
Weight: 0.53
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.33
, cookie
Weight: 0.33
, potato chip
Weight: 0.33
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, pretzel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in delhi 1.00
is banned 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cracker, be banned in delhi)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(cracker, is banned)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cracker, is banned)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cracker, is banned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cracker, is banned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be banned in delhi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cracker, be banned in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cracker, be banned in delhi)