cracker: be served with salad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.56
, junk food
Weight: 0.53
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.33
, cookie
Weight: 0.33
, potato chip
Weight: 0.33
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, pretzel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served with salad 1.00
be served with soup 0.92
be served with oysters 0.81
is tasty 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cracker, be served with salad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(junk food, is tasty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is tasty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cracker, be served with salad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cracker, be served with salad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cracker, be served with soup)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cracker, be served with soup)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cracker, be served with oysters)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cracker, be served with oysters)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be served with oysters)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be served with soup)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cracker, be served with soup)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cracker, be served with oysters)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cracker, is tasty)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cracker, is tasty)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cracker, is tasty)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cracker, is tasty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be served with salad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cracker, be served with salad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cracker, be served with salad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)