cracker: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.56
, junk food
Weight: 0.53
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.33
, cookie
Weight: 0.33
, potato chip
Weight: 0.33
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, pretzel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
have 13 holes 0.92
have holes in them 0.89
has physical part quick 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has physical part quick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cracker, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cracker, have 13 holes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cracker, have holes in them)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cracker, has physical part quick)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cracker, has physical part quick)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cracker, has physical part quick)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cracker, have holes in them)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cracker, has physical part quick)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cracker, have 13 holes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cracker, have 13 holes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cracker, have 13 holes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cracker, have holes in them)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cracker, have holes in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cracker, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cracker, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cracker, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(potato chip, has physical part quick)