cracker: is fattening

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.56
, junk food
Weight: 0.53
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.33
, cookie
Weight: 0.33
, potato chip
Weight: 0.33
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, pretzel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fattening 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, is fattening)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, is fattening)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pretzel, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pretzel, is fattening)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(potato chip, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(potato chip, is fattening)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cracker, is fattening)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cracker, is fattening)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cracker, is fattening)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pretzel, is fattening)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cracker, is fattening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(potato chip, is fattening)