cracking: is addicting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.53
, cause
Weight: 0.51
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
, characteristic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings crack
Weight: 0.35
, tear
Weight: 0.32
, rubbing
Weight: 0.32
, breaking
Weight: 0.31
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is addicting 1.00
is addictive 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(crack, is addictive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rubbing, is addictive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is addictive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(breaking, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(breaking, is addictive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(crack, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(crack, is addictive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rubbing, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rubbing, is addictive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(cracking, is addicting)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cracking, is addictive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addictive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cracking, is addictive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cracking, is addictive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addicting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cracking, is addicting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(breaking, is addictive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(rubbing, is addictive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is addicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(crack, is addictive)