credit card: be higher than car loans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business card
Weight: 0.83
, smart card
Weight: 0.83
, card
Weight: 0.75
, visa card
Weight: 0.71
Siblings debit card
Weight: 0.77
, account
Weight: 0.67
, american express
Weight: 0.63
, password
Weight: 0.61
, visa
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher than car loans 1.00
be better than credit 0.80
be better than cash 0.77
have debt 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be better than credit)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(visa, have debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(debit card, be better than credit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(debit card, be better than credit)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(visa, have debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(visa, have debt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(credit card, be higher than car loans)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(credit card, be better than cash)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be better than cash)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(credit card, be better than cash)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(credit card, be better than cash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be higher than car loans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(credit card, be higher than car loans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(visa, have debt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be higher than car loans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)