cricket: be 2011 game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.63
, carrier
Weight: 0.56
, magazine
Weight: 0.54
, event
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cricket game
Weight: 0.40
, rugby
Weight: 0.37
, hockey game
Weight: 0.36
, football game
Weight: 0.35
, snooker
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be 08 game 1.00
be 2011 game 1.00
be different other team games 0.85
was play 0.83
be played with ball 0.81
be played 0.77
have 11 players 0.77
is played 0.76
was first played 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(game, is played)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(game, is played)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, is played)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rugby, was first played)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be played)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(rugby, is played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(game, is played)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rugby, be played)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rugby, be played)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(rugby, is played)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rugby, is played)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(rugby, was first played)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rugby, was first played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cricket, be 08 game)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cricket, be 08 game)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cricket, be 08 game)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cricket, be different other team games)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cricket, be different other team games)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cricket, be different other team games)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cricket, was play)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cricket, was play)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 08 game)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cricket, be played with ball)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cricket, was play)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cricket, be played with ball)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cricket, be played with ball)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be different other team games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cricket, be played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cricket, be played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cricket, is played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cricket, is played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cricket, was first played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cricket, was first played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cricket, be played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cricket, is played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cricket, was first played)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cricket, was first played)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cricket, was play)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be played)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be played with ball)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cricket, is played)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(game, is played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(rugby, is played)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(rugby, be played)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rugby, was first played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(cricket, be 2011 game)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(game, is played)