crime: be high in fairbanks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in fairbanks 1.00
is high 0.98
be low in areas 0.82
be high in cities 0.81
have highest 0.80
be higher in poor areas 0.79
be higher in summer 0.79
has degree low 0.78
be higher in areas 0.78
be high in beach 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(arson, has degree low)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(arson, has degree low) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arson, has degree low)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(crime, be high in fairbanks)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(crime, be higher in summer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(crime, be higher in summer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(crime, be higher in summer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(crime, be high in cities)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in cities)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in cities)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(crime, be higher in summer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be high in cities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in fairbanks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be high in fairbanks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in fairbanks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arson, has degree low)