crime: be high in south africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in south africa 1.00
be high in africa 0.95
affect south africa 0.94
affect economy of south africa 0.89
affect africa 0.88
affect economy of africa 0.83
is north carolina 0.83
affect south african youth 0.83
be high in london 0.80
be high in latin america 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(arson, is north carolina)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(arson, is north carolina)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(arson, is north carolina)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(crime, be high in south africa)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(crime, be high in london)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, affect economy of south africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(crime, affect economy of south africa)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect economy of south africa)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(crime, affect economy of south africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(arson, is north carolina)