crime: have highest in big cities rates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have highest in big cities rates 1.00
have highest in cities rates 0.98
be high in cities 0.87
have highest 0.85
happen in cities 0.81
rise in many american cities 0.81
be more common in cities 0.81
be higher in areas 0.80
rise in american cities 0.80
be higher in urban areas 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(crime, have highest in big cities rates)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in cities)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(crime, be high in cities)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be high in cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in cities)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(crime, be higher in urban areas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(crime, be higher in urban areas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(crime, be higher in urban areas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(crime, be higher in urban areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crime, have highest in big cities rates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, have highest in big cities rates)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(crime, have highest in big cities rates)