crime: increase in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase in uk 1.00
rise in uk 0.94
is uk 0.91
increase in america 0.85
increase in london 0.84
decrease in america 0.82
increase in mexico city 0.81
be lower in canada 0.80
increase in in adityanath 0.80
increase 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attack, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(attack, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(attack, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attack, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(crime, increase in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in london)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in london)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(crime, increase in london)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(crime, rise in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(crime, increase)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(attack, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(attack, is uk)