crime: vary by culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
vary by culture 1.00
differ from ancient practice 0.77
differ from ancient mesopotamian practice 0.77
be in society influenced 0.76
be in society influenced by schools 0.76
differ from practice 0.76
differ from mesopotamian practice 0.76
be different 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pedophilia, be different)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(crime, vary by culture)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(crime, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(crime, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(crime, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(crime, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(crime, vary by culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(crime, vary by culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(crime, vary by culture)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be different)