criminal: engage in money laundering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, individual
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, other people
Weight: 0.54
Siblings child molester
Weight: 0.68
, drug addict
Weight: 0.67
, hacker
Weight: 0.63
, terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
engage in money laundering 1.00
launder money 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, launder money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(drug dealer, launder money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, launder money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(criminal, engage in money laundering)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(criminal, launder money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(criminal, launder money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(criminal, launder money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(criminal, launder money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(criminal, engage in money laundering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(criminal, engage in money laundering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(criminal, engage in money laundering)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(drug dealer, launder money)