criminal: extradited to state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, individual
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, other people
Weight: 0.54
Siblings child molester
Weight: 0.68
, drug addict
Weight: 0.67
, hacker
Weight: 0.63
, terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
extradited to state 1.00
get extradited 0.99
be extradited to us 0.98
be prosecuted by state 0.77
return to prison 0.76
go to jail 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, go to jail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(drug addict, go to jail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(drug dealer, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, go to jail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(drug addict, go to jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drug addict, go to jail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(criminal, extradited to state)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(criminal, be extradited to us)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(criminal, be extradited to us)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(criminal, be extradited to us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(criminal, be extradited to us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(criminal, return to prison)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(criminal, return to prison)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(criminal, return to prison)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(criminal, return to prison)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(criminal, be prosecuted by state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(criminal, go to jail)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(criminal, go to jail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(criminal, go to jail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(criminal, go to jail)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(criminal, be prosecuted by state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(criminal, be prosecuted by state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(criminal, be prosecuted by state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(criminal, extradited to state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(drug dealer, go to jail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(criminal, extradited to state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(drug addict, go to jail)