critic: be at movie

Related concepts

Parents	writer Weight: 0.72 , author Weight: 0.59 , friend Weight: 0.57 , authority Weight: 0.57 , reaction Weight: 0.56
Siblings	journalist Weight: 0.36 , novelist Weight: 0.34 , historian Weight: 0.34 , poet Weight: 0.34 , philosopher Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at movie	1.00
be at theater	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(friend, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(critic, be at movie)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(friend, be at theater) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(critic, be at movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(friend, be at movie)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(friend, be at theater)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(friend, be at movie)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(friend, be at theater)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(friend, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(critic, be at movie)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(friend, be at theater) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(critic, be at movie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(critic, be at movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(critic, be at movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(critic, be at movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(friend, be at movie)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(friend, be at theater)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(friend, be at movie)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(critic, be at movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(friend, be at theater)