critic: interrogating terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents writer
Weight: 0.72
, author
Weight: 0.59
, friend
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.57
, reaction
Weight: 0.56
Siblings journalist
Weight: 0.36
, novelist
Weight: 0.34
, historian
Weight: 0.34
, poet
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
interrogating terms 1.00
insist interrogating 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(critic, interrogating terms)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(critic, insist interrogating)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(critic, insist interrogating)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(critic, insist interrogating)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(critic, insist interrogating)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(critic, interrogating terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(critic, interrogating terms)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(critic, interrogating terms)