crook: be duck police

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.51
, people
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.50
, fool
Weight: 0.49
Siblings steve job
Weight: 0.59
, con artist
Weight: 0.57
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be duck police 1.00
be at police station 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(crook, be duck police)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(crook, be at police station)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(crook, be at police station)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crook, be at police station)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(crook, be at police station)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(crook, be duck police)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(crook, be duck police) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(crook, be duck police)