crook: reduced to nothing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.50
, fool
Weight: 0.49
, label
Weight: 0.44
Siblings steve job
Weight: 0.59
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
reduced to nothing 1.00
work for nothing 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(crook, reduced to nothing)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(crook, work for nothing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(crook, work for nothing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(crook, work for nothing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crook, work for nothing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(crook, reduced to nothing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(crook, reduced to nothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(crook, reduced to nothing)