crook: steal laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.50
, fool
Weight: 0.49
, label
Weight: 0.44
Siblings steve job
Weight: 0.59
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
steal laptops 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(crook, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thief, steal laptops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crook, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(thief, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(thief, steal laptops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crook, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(crook, steal laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(crook, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(crook, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(crook, steal laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crook, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(crook, steal laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(crook, steal laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(thief, steal laptops)