cross country: look good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.67
, team
Weight: 0.62
, track
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cross country skiing
Weight: 0.39
, curling
Weight: 0.33
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
look good 1.00
has quality good 0.78
is like 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(track, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cross country, look good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cross country, look good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(track, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(track, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cross country, look good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cross country, look good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cross country, look good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cross country, is like)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cross country, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cross country, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cross country, is like)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cross country, is like)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cross country, is like)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cross country, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cross country, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cross country, look good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cross country, look good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cross country, look good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality good)