cross street: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents landmark
Weight: 0.56
, location
Weight: 0.55
, address
Weight: 0.50
, car
Weight: 0.50
, information
Weight: 0.47
Siblings sidewalk
Weight: 0.32
, central park
Weight: 0.32
, intersection
Weight: 0.32
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.32
, bridge
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bridge, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bridge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bridge, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cross street, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cross street, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cross street, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cross street, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cross street, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cross street, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cross street, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bridge, has quality good)