crunch: be considered pick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exercise
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, movement
Weight: 0.44
, ab
Weight: 0.41
, move
Weight: 0.41
Siblings dilemma
Weight: 0.32
, hangover
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, hiccup
Weight: 0.31
, slump
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered offlane pick 1.00
be considered pick 1.00
be considered bad pick 0.96
be considered bad offlane pick 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(crunch, be considered pick)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(crunch, be considered offlane pick)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(crunch, be considered bad offlane pick)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(crunch, be considered bad pick)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(crunch, be considered bad offlane pick)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(crunch, be considered bad offlane pick)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(crunch, be considered offlane pick)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(crunch, be considered offlane pick)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(crunch, be considered bad pick)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(crunch, be considered bad pick)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(crunch, be considered offlane pick)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(crunch, be considered bad offlane pick)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(crunch, be considered bad pick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crunch, be considered pick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crunch, be considered pick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(crunch, be considered pick)