cue: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.51
, message
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.43
, function
Weight: 0.43
, factor
Weight: 0.43
Siblings inflection
Weight: 0.44
, flip flop
Weight: 0.30
, shower head
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is terrible 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(shower head, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(shower head, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(shower head, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cue, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cue, is terrible)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cue, is terrible)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cue, is terrible)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cue, is terrible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cue, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cue, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(shower head, has quality bad)