cunt: has quality worst

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.51
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.37
, whore
Weight: 0.37
, bitch
Weight: 0.36
, shit
Weight: 0.36
, fuck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worst 1.00
has quality bad 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cunt, has quality worst)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fuck, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shit, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(f word, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cunt, has quality worst)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fuck, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fuck, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(shit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(shit, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(f word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(f word, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cunt, has quality worst)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cunt, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cunt, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cunt, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cunt, has quality worst)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fuck, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(f word, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cunt, has quality worst) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)