cup: have concave bottoms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have concave bottoms 1.00
has physical part bottoms 0.84
is cylindrical 0.77
have ridges in neck 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(container, is cylindrical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cup, have concave bottoms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(container, is cylindrical)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(container, is cylindrical)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(container, is cylindrical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cup, have concave bottoms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cup, have concave bottoms)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cup, have ridges in neck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cup, have concave bottoms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cup, have concave bottoms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(container, is cylindrical)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(cup, have concave bottoms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(container, is cylindrical)