curb: be used to direct flow of traffic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.56
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, object
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.50
Siblings stop sign
Weight: 0.33
, street sign
Weight: 0.32
, stem
Weight: 0.32
, counter
Weight: 0.31
, ratchet
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to direct flow of traffic 1.00
be used to direct water flow 0.93
be used to control traffic 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(stop sign, be used to control traffic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(stop sign, be used to control traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(stop sign, be used to control traffic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(curb, be used to direct water flow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(curb, be used to direct water flow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(curb, be used to direct water flow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(curb, be used to direct water flow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(curb, be used to direct flow of traffic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(stop sign, be used to control traffic)