current: be increased

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.59
, quantity
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.50
Siblings ampere
Weight: 0.47
, management
Weight: 0.31
, duration
Weight: 0.31
, interest rate
Weight: 0.31
, cost
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be increased 1.00
have rise 0.78
is reduction 0.78
be on rise 0.77
rise 2018 0.77
need rise 0.77
be reduced in purchasing 0.77
be on decline 0.77
rise during expansion 0.76
keep rising 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cost, be reduced in purchasing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be on rise)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, need rise)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, have rise)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(interest rate, have rise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(interest rate, have rise)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(interest rate, be on rise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be on rise)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(interest rate, need rise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(interest rate, need rise)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cost, be reduced in purchasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cost, be reduced in purchasing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(current, be increased)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(current, be increased)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(interest rate, have rise)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(interest rate, be on rise)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(interest rate, need rise)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(current, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cost, be reduced in purchasing)