custard: set

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.76
, dish
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.64
, sweet
Weight: 0.60
, ice cream
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flan
Weight: 0.63
, lemon curd
Weight: 0.61
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.40
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.40
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
set 1.00
come in sets 0.86
come in sets of 5 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(dish, come in sets of 5)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(custard, set)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(dish, come in sets)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(custard, set)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(dish, come in sets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(dish, come in sets of 5)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dish, come in sets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(dish, come in sets of 5)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(dish, come in sets of 5)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(custard, set)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(dish, come in sets)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(custard, set)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(custard, set)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(custard, set)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(custard, set)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(dish, come in sets)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dish, come in sets of 5)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(dish, come in sets)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(custard, set)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dish, come in sets of 5)