customer: be considered stakeholders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered stakeholders 1.00
is stakeholders 0.97
is important stakeholders 0.96
is most important stakeholders 0.95
is key stakeholders 0.93
is external stakeholders 0.89
is stakeholder 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(customer, is stakeholders)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(customer, is key stakeholders)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(customer, is most important stakeholders)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, is important stakeholders)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(customer, is stakeholders)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(customer, is stakeholders)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(customer, is external stakeholders)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(customer, is stakeholder)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(customer, is external stakeholders)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(customer, is stakeholders)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(customer, is external stakeholders)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(customer, is stakeholder)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(customer, is stakeholder)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(customer, is key stakeholders)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(customer, is external stakeholders)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(customer, is stakeholder)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(customer, is key stakeholders)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(customer, is important stakeholders)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(customer, is most important stakeholders)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(customer, is important stakeholders)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(customer, is most important stakeholders)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(customer, is important stakeholders)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(customer, is key stakeholders)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(customer, is most important stakeholders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(customer, be considered stakeholders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(customer, be considered stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(customer, be considered stakeholders)