customer: be loyal to brand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be loyal to brand 1.00
stay loyal to brand 0.97
be loyal to brands 0.96
is loyal 0.92
stay loyal 0.87
remain loyal 0.86
go for brand 0.84
be loyal to apple 0.84
go for particular brand 0.80
prefer brands 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(customer, be loyal to brand)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(customer, stay loyal to brand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(customer, be loyal to brands)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(customer, stay loyal to brand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(customer, stay loyal to brand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(customer, be loyal to apple)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(customer, be loyal to brands)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(customer, be loyal to brands)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(customer, be loyal to apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(customer, be loyal to apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(customer, be loyal to apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(customer, go for brand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(customer, stay loyal to brand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(customer, go for particular brand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(customer, prefer brands)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brands)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(customer, prefer brands)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(customer, go for brand)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(customer, prefer brands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(customer, go for brand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(customer, go for particular brand)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(customer, go for particular brand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(customer, prefer brands)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(customer, go for brand)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(customer, go for particular brand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(customer, be loyal to brand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(customer, be loyal to brand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(customer, be loyal to brand)