customer: sit at tables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
sit at tables 1.00
sit at dirty tables 0.95
sit in restaurants 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(customer, sit at tables)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(customer, sit at dirty tables)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(customer, sit at dirty tables)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(customer, sit at dirty tables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(customer, sit in restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(customer, sit in restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(customer, sit in restaurants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(customer, sit at dirty tables)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(customer, sit in restaurants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(customer, sit at tables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(customer, sit at tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(customer, sit at tables)