customer: take number

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business
Weight: 0.61
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, operator
Weight: 0.59
, citizen
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
take number 1.00
tell phone number 0.79
come in many size 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fan, come in many size)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(customer, take number)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fan, come in many size)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fan, come in many size)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operator, tell phone number)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fan, come in many size)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(customer, take number)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operator, tell phone number)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(operator, tell phone number)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(customer, take number)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(customer, take number)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(customer, take number)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fan, come in many size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(operator, tell phone number)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(customer, take number)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fan, come in many size)