cut: be better than imovie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chuck
Weight: 0.67
, loin
Weight: 0.62
, tenderloin
Weight: 0.54
, chop
Weight: 0.49
, flank
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than imovie 1.00
be faster than copy 0.78
be faster on pc 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cut, be better than imovie)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cut, be faster than copy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cut, be faster on pc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cut, be faster than copy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cut, be faster on pc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cut, be faster than copy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cut, be faster on pc)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cut, be faster on pc)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cut, be faster than copy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cut, be better than imovie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cut, be better than imovie)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cut, be better than imovie)