cut: hurt more than big cuts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chuck
Weight: 0.67
, loin
Weight: 0.62
, tenderloin
Weight: 0.54
, chop
Weight: 0.49
, flank
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt more than big cuts 1.00
hurt more than bigger cuts 0.98
hurt more 0.88
hurt 0.82
hurt in water 0.80
hurt at night 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cut, hurt more than big cuts)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cut, hurt more than bigger cuts)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cut, hurt more than bigger cuts)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cut, hurt more than bigger cuts)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cut, hurt more)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cut, hurt more)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cut, hurt more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cut, hurt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cut, hurt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cut, hurt in water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cut, hurt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cut, hurt more than bigger cuts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cut, hurt in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cut, hurt at night)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cut, hurt in water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cut, hurt at night)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cut, hurt at night)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cut, hurt more)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cut, hurt in water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cut, hurt at night)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cut, hurt more than big cuts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cut, hurt more than big cuts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cut, hurt more than big cuts)