cutting: affect air

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect air 1.00
affect environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cutting, affect air)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cutting, affect air)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cutting, affect air)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cutting, affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cutting, affect environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cutting, affect environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cutting, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cutting, affect air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cutting, affect air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(cutting, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)