cutting: be physical change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be physical change 1.00
is physical change 0.99
has quality change 0.84
is chemical change 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cutting, be physical change)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cutting, is physical change)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(cutting, is physical change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cutting, is physical change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cutting, is chemical change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cutting, has quality change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cutting, is physical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cutting, has quality change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cutting, has quality change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cutting, is chemical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cutting, is chemical change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has quality change)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cutting, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be physical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cutting, be physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cutting, be physical change)