cutting: be with polythene bags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with polythene bags 1.00
be covered with polythene bags 0.98
grow better in polythene bag 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cutting, be with polythene bags)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cutting, be covered with polythene bags)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cutting, grow better in polythene bag)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cutting, be covered with polythene bags)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cutting, grow better in polythene bag)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cutting, grow better in polythene bag)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be covered with polythene bags)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cutting, be covered with polythene bags)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cutting, grow better in polythene bag)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be with polythene bags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cutting, be with polythene bags)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cutting, be with polythene bags)