cutting: has physical part hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hair 1.00
is hair bad 0.88
is own hair 0.87
is own hair bad 0.85
make hair healthier 0.79
is hairstyle 0.77
hairstyle 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cutting, has physical part hair)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cutting, is own hair bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cutting, is hairstyle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cutting, hairstyle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cutting, hairstyle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cutting, is own hair bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cutting, is hairstyle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cutting, hairstyle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cutting, is own hair bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cutting, hairstyle)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cutting, is hairstyle)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cutting, is hairstyle)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cutting, is own hair bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has physical part hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cutting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cutting, has physical part hair)