cutting: has state addiction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state addiction 1.00
become addiction 0.95
be for people with depression 0.77
is addictive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(shaving, is addictive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(shaving, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(shaving, is addictive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cutting, has state addiction)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cutting, become addiction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cutting, become addiction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cutting, become addiction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cutting, become addiction)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cutting, is addictive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be for people with depression)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cutting, is addictive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cutting, is addictive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cutting, be for people with depression)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cutting, be for people with depression)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cutting, be for people with depression)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cutting, is addictive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has state addiction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cutting, has state addiction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has state addiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(shaving, is addictive)