cycling: be played in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.64
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played in france 1.00
be in france 0.91
be popular in france 0.89
be played 0.82
be in europe 0.77
be regarded around europe 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(snowboarding, be played)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(snowboarding, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(snowboarding, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cycling, be played in france)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be played)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cycling, be played)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cycling, be played)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cycling, be played)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be in france)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cycling, be in france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cycling, be regarded around europe)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in france)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in france)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cycling, be in france)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cycling, be in france)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cycling, be in europe)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cycling, be regarded around europe)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be in europe)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in france)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cycling, be in europe)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cycling, be regarded around europe)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in france)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be regarded around europe)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cycling, be in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be played in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cycling, be played in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be played in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(snowboarding, be played)