cyclist: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.69
, user
Weight: 0.60
, commuter
Weight: 0.59
, road
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gymnast
Weight: 0.36
, swimmer
Weight: 0.36
, boxer
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.35
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cyclist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(gymnast, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(gymnast, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cyclist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cyclist, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cyclist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cyclist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cyclist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cyclist, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gymnast, has quality good)