cyclist: have thin arms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.69
, user
Weight: 0.60
, commuter
Weight: 0.59
, road
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gymnast
Weight: 0.36
, swimmer
Weight: 0.36
, boxer
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.35
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thin arms 1.00
have small arms 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, have small arms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(tennis player, have small arms)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(tennis player, have small arms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cyclist, have thin arms)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, have small arms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cyclist, have small arms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cyclist, have small arms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cyclist, have small arms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, have thin arms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cyclist, have thin arms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, have thin arms)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennis player, have small arms)