cyclist: wear long socks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.69
, user
Weight: 0.60
, commuter
Weight: 0.59
, road
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gymnast
Weight: 0.36
, swimmer
Weight: 0.36
, boxer
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.35
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear long socks 1.00
wear socks 0.98
wear shoes 0.89
pull up socks 0.88
wear compression socks 0.87
wear clothes 0.87
wear gloves 0.87
wear ankle socks 0.86
wear overshoes 0.84
wear fitting clothes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boxer, wear gloves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(boxer, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(boxer, wear gloves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cyclist, wear long socks)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cyclist, wear clothes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cyclist, wear gloves)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cyclist, wear clothes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cyclist, wear clothes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cyclist, wear gloves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cyclist, wear gloves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, wear gloves)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, wear clothes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, wear long socks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cyclist, wear long socks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(boxer, wear gloves)