cyclops: is good mcoc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, hero
Weight: 0.63
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, mutant
Weight: 0.56
, giant
Weight: 0.53
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37
, basilisk
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, unicorn
Weight: 0.36
, beast
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good mcoc 1.00
has quality good 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hero, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cyclops, is good mcoc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hero, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hero, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beast, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hero, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cyclops, is good mcoc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beast, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beast, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cyclops, is good mcoc)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cyclops, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cyclops, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cyclops, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, is good mcoc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cyclops, is good mcoc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hero, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(beast, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(cyclops, is good mcoc)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hero, has quality good)