cylinder: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents piston
Weight: 0.64
, product
Weight: 0.57
, shape
Weight: 0.54
, container
Weight: 0.54
, geometry
Weight: 0.54
Siblings carburetor
Weight: 0.33
, car tire
Weight: 0.33
, car battery
Weight: 0.32
, compact disc
Weight: 0.32
, alloy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90
has quality joke 0.80
go bad 0.79
has quality uses 0.76
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(piston, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(piston, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(piston, go bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(piston, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(piston, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(piston, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(piston, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(piston, go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(piston, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carburetor, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(carburetor, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(car battery, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(car tire, has quality uses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(piston, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(piston, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(piston, go bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(carburetor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(carburetor, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(carburetor, go bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(carburetor, go bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(car tire, has quality uses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(car tire, has quality uses)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(car battery, go bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(car battery, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cylinder, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cylinder, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cylinder, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cylinder, go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, go bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cylinder, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality joke)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cylinder, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality definition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality joke)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cylinder, has quality joke)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cylinder, has quality joke)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cylinder, has quality definition)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cylinder, has quality definition)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(piston, go bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(piston, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(piston, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carburetor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(carburetor, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(car battery, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(car tire, has quality uses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(piston, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(piston, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cylinder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(piston, has quality better)