cypress: be less expensive than katy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.73
, tree
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.63
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.39
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, sycamore
Weight: 0.38
, pine
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less expensive than katy 1.00
is expensive 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pine, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pine, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(maple tree, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cypress, be less expensive than katy)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cypress, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cypress, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cypress, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cypress, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cypress, be less expensive than katy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cypress, be less expensive than katy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cypress, be less expensive than katy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(maple tree, is expensive)