dachshund: have seizures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.77
, small dog
Weight: 0.72
, breed
Weight: 0.64
, puppy
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.53
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.41
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.40
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.39
, poodle
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have seizures 1.00
be prone to seizures 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have seizures)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(beagle, be prone to seizures)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have seizures)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(beagle, be prone to seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(beagle, be prone to seizures)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(dachshund, have seizures)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, be prone to seizures)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dachshund, be prone to seizures)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(dachshund, be prone to seizures)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(dachshund, be prone to seizures)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have seizures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dachshund, have seizures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have seizures)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have seizures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(beagle, be prone to seizures)