daffodils: be grown

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bulb
Weight: 0.50
, flower
Weight: 0.49
, perennial
Weight: 0.45
, narcissus
Weight: 0.36
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.34
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.34
, daffodil
Weight: 0.34
, tulip
Weight: 0.33
, aster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be grown 1.00
grow 0.85
be grown in kenya 0.82
be grown for commercial distribution 0.81
grow in places 0.77
grow fruit 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flower, grow)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(daffodils, be grown)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bulb, grow)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(daffodils, be grown)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bulb, grow)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(flower, grow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bulb, grow)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(flower, grow)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flower, grow)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(bulb, grow)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(daffodils, be grown)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(daffodils, be grown)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(daffodils, grow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(daffodils, grow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(daffodils, grow in places)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(daffodils, grow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(daffodils, grow in places)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, grow)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(daffodils, grow in places)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, grow in places)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(daffodils, be grown)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(flower, grow)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bulb, grow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(flower, grow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(daffodils, be grown)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bulb, grow)